If you hit a car from behind you are usually legally at fault true or false?

Yes. A rear end accident, in the eyes of the insurance industry is ALMOST always at fault for the rear vehicle.





There are only three scenarios that I can think of that it would not be at fault, or will need further investigation: if the front car backs into the rear car, or if someone slams their brakes in front of you, in an effort to commit insurance fraud. Also if someone intentionally slams their brakes, just to be a jerk.If you hit a car from behind you are usually legally at fault true or false?
For the purpose of the technical specifics behind the law unless you can prove you were not at fault like they were backing up then its your fault. Then you might want to get a witness to do that. I had a lady back into me up a hill and then deny that her mecedes did that. I could prove it because of the angle that she hit my car her insurance company looked at it and blamed her. My car did not jump sideways to hit her.She hit the front quarterpanel. The proof is sometimes right there. No ticket was issued but she had a hit on her insurance.If you hit a car from behind you are usually legally at fault true or false?
Unless they backed out in front of you. If they did this and you had no place to go you could have the police make out a report stating that it was not your fault. If you were just driving down the road and hit him then you are definitely at fault.
Legally, yes, although the crash is usually caused by the car in front of the one that gets hit.
you're at fault.
assured clear distance ... true its your fault.. or satans..